You can use your context powers to figure this out, but here's the backstory anyway: The president of the College of William and Mary decided to remove the cross from their chapel so that non-Christians would feel better about coming in. Consternations were voiced.
Whether removing the cross was a good idea, and whether its real motive was the same as the stated motive -- these are factors I have no information about, so I'm in no position to pronounce an irrelevant judgment here. I'm generally in favor of not alienating people of other faiths, and as long as we don't do without Christ, we can do without symbols of Christ.College Returns Cross to Chapel Following Revoked Gift
The College of William and Mary has restored a cross to its chapel after its removal prompted a donor to revoke a $12-million pledge, report The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Virginian-Pilot.
The college had taken down the cross, which had been displayed on the altar since 1932, in October in an effort to encourage students from all faiths to feel free to worship at the chapel. The move was received by some critics as an insult to the college's Christian history and founding. The controversy culminated in an unnamed donor's decision to withdraw a $12-million pledge last week.
The 18-inch cross will now be displayed in a glass case in a "prominent, readily visible place" inside the chapel. An area that houses sacred objects will now include pieces from other faiths.
Whether the unidentified donor will reconsider, now that cross is being returned, was unclear, The Chronicle reported.
But this stab at mollification is far lousier than just removing the thing. Our religious symbol was restored so it could rest in a little box near other religions' symbols. Instead of removing the symbols altogether, let's just rearrange them to make our God seem approximate with other people's gods.
Oh well, at least Mammon was appeased. Gods forbid principle would cost more than $12M.