A big list of Non-Errors in English grammar and usage. Things that some people think are important, but really? Not so much.
Fresh out of college, I was an editor for a start-up children's magazine that you've never heard of and doesn't still exist. We were at a trade show or something, and a large-ish promotional piece said something about "raising children." I had written those words, since I was the staff copywriter. (I was the staff everythingwriter.)
During a lull, a smugly smarmy gentleman selling children's dictionaries crossed the aisle to inform me that the proper phrase was "rearing children."
"Yeah, but nobody talks that way," I said. It's a legitimate rebuttal, but secretly I felt chastised.
The pang of that public shame combined with my fondness for the mongrel nature of English has led me, as a professional, to loathe language snobbery.
I tend to practice the "correct" version of many of these non-errors even though I'm usually the only person in the room who knows or cares what they are. But if someone bundled them into a sack and dropped them down a well, I'd hold the bucket out of the way.
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
Populism Always Wins
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Now isn't that funny? I have acquired the nickname "the language snob" so I happen to be quite fond of language snobbery. However, the fact that I'm a language snob harms me more than anyone else since I'm the only who cringes when someone types "should of" instead of "should have" or when they say "her and I" instead of either "her and me" or "she and I" or when they say "have ran" or "have went" or... OH MY GOSH I CAN'T TAKE ANYMORE!!! I think I need a nap.
Oh, forgot to post a link that gives me nightmares...
You can turn in your "language snob" badge at the front desk.
That is not the stuff of nightmares. That is the logophile's rec room.
Post a Comment